lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:31:03AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:57:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 09:26:41PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > > > > > May I keep them inline?
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem with such manual inlines is that we force gcc to always
> > > > > inline them - and history has shown that functions grow without the
> > > > > "inline" being removed.
> > > >
> > > > what do you mean by "we force gcc to always inline them"?
> > >
> > > #define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
> > >
> > > > gcc is free to decide whether to inline or to not inline.
> > >
> > > Not with __attribute__((always_inline)).
> >
> > but that wasnt used in the code you patched:
> >
> > -inline int acpi_battery_present(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> > +static int acpi_battery_present(struct acpi_battery *battery)
>
> >From compiler-gcc.h:
>
> #define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
>
> So unless I am missing something obvious then each time we
> say inline to a function we require gcc to inline the function.

Exactly.

> It is my impression that today we only say inline if really needed
> and otherwise let gcc decide. So in almost all cases inlise should
> just be nuked?

The rule is:
- all static functions in headers should be marked inline
- no functions in .c files should be marked inline

For the latter there are a _few_ exceptions in hotpaths where doing so
brings measurable advantages.

But generally (and especially long-term) it's best to let gcc decide
which static functions in .c files should be inlined.

> Sam

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-03 10:53    [W:0.323 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site