Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:53:30 +0000 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Re: using long instead of atomic_t when only set/read is required |
| |
> Atomicity of reads of write for pointers and integral types (other than > long long) should be documented.
NAK.
Atomicity of reads or writes for pointers and integral types is NOT guaranteed. Gcc doesn't believe in your guarantee.
Alan
| |