[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."
Xpl++ wrote:
> Paul Menage ??????:
>> ...
>> A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future
>> names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add
>> the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that
>> there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I
>> suspect) they're much less used.
> This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software
> (most likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as
> this is something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup
> would be using anyway and it is not that much associated with a
> particulat subsystem.

And it makes most sense to me too, though I still doubt name collision
will be a problem.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-03 08:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean