[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."
    Xpl++ wrote:
    > Paul Menage ??????:
    >> ...
    >> A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future
    >> names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add
    >> the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that
    >> there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I
    >> suspect) they're much less used.
    > This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software
    > (most likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as
    > this is something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup
    > would be using anyway and it is not that much associated with a
    > particulat subsystem.

    And it makes most sense to me too, though I still doubt name collision
    will be a problem.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-03 08:31    [W:0.020 / U:4.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site