On 29-03-08 23:11, Richard Jonsson wrote:

>> Does the weirdness persist if you boot with "io_delay=0x80" as a 
>> kernel parameter? (it should if -rc3 really was fine, but...)
> 
> I'm testing that param at the moment, and while writing this response it 
> happened again, meaning it didn't change anything..

Okay, expected, but the "HP dvXXXX" triggered the reply.

> I can't say for sure rc3 wasn't affected, I just never noticed the 
> behavior during the 2-3 weeks I used it.

Haven't been following the list lately, but I believe I read something about 
a scheduler / X.org interaction problem. Afraid that's all from me though...

Rene.