Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:16:40 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][1/3] Add user interface for virtual address space control (v2) |
| |
Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:20:06 +0530 >> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> Add as_usage_in_bytes and as_limit_in_bytes interfaces. These provide >>> control over the total address space that the processes combined together >>> in the cgroup can grow upto. This functionality is analogous to >>> the RLIMIT_AS function of the getrlimit(2) and setrlimit(2) calls. >>> A as_res resource counter is added to the mem_cgroup structure. The >>> as_res counter handles all the accounting associated with the virtual >>> address space accounting and control of cgroups. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> I wonder that it's better to create "rlimit cgroup" rather than enhancing >> memory controller. (But I have no strong opinion.) >> How do you think ? > > I believe that all memory management is better to have in one controller... >
Paul wants to see it in a different controller. He has been reasoning it out in another email thread.
-- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL
| |