lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Poor performance now? Please, put weighted velocities ctxts/s to the sched.decision!
    On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:29 PM, J.C. Pizarro <jcpiza@gmail.com> wrote:
    > [2] "Re: Serious performance regression in Wine applications and Linux 2.6.24.*"
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/25/181
    > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:49:13 -0700, "Ray Lee" wrote:
    > > Andi's idea of looking for excessive context switches is good -- I
    > > didn't see a response to that one. Other than that, if you're only
    > > noticing the issue in 3d games, then it could be several things (not
    > > just the scheduler).
    >
    > The kernel needed the velocity parameter to gain it: ctxts per interval
    > (normally ctxts/s or ctxts/minute).

    We don't know that's the problem yet. The reporter is doing more testing.

    > "Please, put 64-bit counter per task and incr.by.one each ctxt switch."
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/398
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/401
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/406
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/24/1
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/24/103
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/24/157
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/159

    There are already counters recording the switches:
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/25/314

    > My proposal is free for yours, quasi-bastards, I won't charge you!

    My parents were married.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-25 21:41    [W:0.048 / U:0.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site