lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"

--- Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> schrieb:

> Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael
> Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the difference between booting a dual
> core
> > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the
> second
> > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> >
> > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and
> switch to UP only,
> > optimising some locks and instructions.
>
> CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely
> it accounts
> for that much performance difference.
>
> If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0
> disables
> the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference.
> But it should
> be actually slower.
>
> There should be actually no difference in theory
> between max_cpus=1
> and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.

I had the following time values:

maxcpus=1:
real 0m1.642s
user 0m1.528s
sys 0m0.068s

maxcpus=2 and
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real 0m2.579s
user 0m4.096s
sys 0m0.160s

maxcpus=2 and
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real 0m3.757s
user 0m3.632s
sys 0m0.112s







Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails jetzt einfach von unterwegs.
www.yahoo.de/go



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-25 18:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog