lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc
From
Date

On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 08:08 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:35 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 15:22 +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > > Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > Total: 4691827 Total: 3942000
> > > >
> > > Thanks. Unfortunately the test was buggy, it bound the tasks to the
> > > wrong cpu :-(
> > > Could you run it again? Actually 1 cpu and 4 cpus are probably enough.
> >
> > Sure. (ran as before, hopefully no transcription errors)
>
> Looking at the output over morning java, I noticed that pmsg didn't get
> recompiled due to a fat finger, so those numbers are bogus. Corrected
> condensed version of output is below, charted data attached.
>
> (hope evolution doesn't turn this into something other than plain text)

Pff, I'd rather have had the bounce. Good thing I attached the damn
chart, evolution can't screw that up.

>
>
>
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 2.6.22.18-cfs-v24.1 psem
> 4791557
> 9403536
> 13583603
> 18103350
> 2.6.22.18-cfs-v24.1 pmsg
> 4906249
> 9171440
> 13264752
> 17774106
> 2.6.24.3 psem
> 4009069
> 7578648
> 8044041
> 5134381
> 2.6.24.3 pmsg
> 3917588
> 7290206
> 7644794
> 4824967
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-23 08:23    [W:0.055 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site