[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim

I think this patch is very good improvement.
but it is not related to split lru.

Why don't you separate this patch?
IMHO treat as independent patch is better.


> During an AIM7 run on a 16GB system, fork started failing around
> 32000 threads, despite the system having plenty of free swap and
> 15GB of pageable memory.
> If normal pageout does not result in contiguous free pages for
> kernel stacks, fall back to lumpy reclaim instead of failing fork
> or doing excessive pageout IO.
> I do not know whether this change is needed due to the extreme
> stress test or because the inactive list is a smaller fraction
> of system memory on huge systems.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-02 11:39    [W:0.180 / U:2.588 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site