Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:06:54 +0900 | From | "minchan Kim" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure |
| |
Sorry, I sended HTML format, so fail to send linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I will resend in TEXT/PLAIN format.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM, minchan Kim <barrioskmc@gmail.com> wrote: > One more thing. > > zoneinfo_show_print fail to show right information. > That's why 'enum zone_stat_item' and 'vmstat_text' index didn't matched. > This is a problem about CONFIG_NORECLAIM, too. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:58 +0900, minchan Kim wrote: > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM > > > +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page) > > > +{ > > > + __lru_cache_add(page, LRU_NORECLAIM); > > > +} > > > +#else > > > +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page) > > > +{ > > > + BUG("Noreclaim not configured, but page added > > > anyway?!"); > > > +} > > > +#endif > > > + > > > > > > BUG() can't take a argument. > > > > Right. I don't have a clue how that got there :-(. > > > > Thanks, > > Lee > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > barrios
-- Thanks, barrios
| |