Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet | Date | Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:48:47 -0800 |
| |
On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:42, David Newall wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > That is why I keep recommending that a ramback setup be replicated or > > mirrored, which people in this thread keep glossing over. When > > replicated or mirrored, you still get the microsecond-level transaction > > times, and you get the safety too. > > Do you mean it should be replicated with a second ramback? That would > be pretty pointless, since all failure modes would affect both. It's > not like one ramback will survive a crash when the other doesn't.
A second machine running a second ramback, on a second UPS pair. I thought that was obvious.
Daniel
| |