lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
Date
On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:42, David Newall wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > That is why I keep recommending that a ramback setup be replicated or
> > mirrored, which people in this thread keep glossing over. When
> > replicated or mirrored, you still get the microsecond-level transaction
> > times, and you get the safety too.
>
> Do you mean it should be replicated with a second ramback? That would
> be pretty pointless, since all failure modes would affect both. It's
> not like one ramback will survive a crash when the other doesn't.

A second machine running a second ramback, on a second UPS pair.
I thought that was obvious.

Daniel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-16 21:51    [W:0.140 / U:1.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site