Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet | Date | Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:43:36 -0800 |
| |
On Sunday 16 March 2008 16:08, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net> writes: > >> It could, in a bit different location maybe, but it isn't a substitute > >> for ordered writes. > > > > How so? > > Not sure if I understand the question correctly but obviously a pair > (mirror) of servers running "dangerous" ramback would survive a crash > of one machine and we could practically eliminate the probability of > both (all) machines crashing simultaneously. However, there are > cheaper ways to achieve similar performance and even better > reliability - including those battery-backed (RAI)Disk controllers.
OK, so we are only searching for the cheapest way to achieve these kinds of speeds, for some given uptime and risk level requirements. That is a really interesting subject, but can we please leave it for a while so I can get some work done on the code itself?
Thanks,
Daniel
| |