lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: fix aperture vs. suspend problem
On Fri 2008-03-14 09:14:23, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2008-03-13 15:32:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > This is also needed in 2.6.24, perhaps earlier?
> >
> > It seems to only trigger on >3GB boxes, during swsusp. People are not
> > normally suspending those big boxes. I do not think this is worth
> > backporting.
>
> Here vendors are starting to sell x86_64 laptops with 4GB ram in the
> *default* configuration --- so I think that yes, it should be
> backported, at least to 2.6.24 (which will be heavily shipped by distros
> this year, I suppose).

Ok, if you hit the problem, you can do the backport. Subject is wrong,
it hits hibernation, not suspend (sorry), and I'm not yet sure if I
fixed all the related problems. Testing welcome.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-14 20:33    [W:0.031 / U:16.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site