Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:49 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: fix aperture vs. suspend problem |
| |
On Fri 2008-03-14 09:14:23, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2008-03-13 15:32:48, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > [...] > > > This is also needed in 2.6.24, perhaps earlier? > > > > It seems to only trigger on >3GB boxes, during swsusp. People are not > > normally suspending those big boxes. I do not think this is worth > > backporting. > > Here vendors are starting to sell x86_64 laptops with 4GB ram in the > *default* configuration --- so I think that yes, it should be > backported, at least to 2.6.24 (which will be heavily shipped by distros > this year, I suppose).
Ok, if you hit the problem, you can do the backport. Subject is wrong, it hits hibernation, not suspend (sorry), and I'm not yet sure if I fixed all the related problems. Testing welcome. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/
| |