lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectAudit vs netlink interaction problem
Hi, David!

I've found an interesting feature of how audit uses netlink for
communications. Look.

The kauditd_thread() calls netlink_unicast() and passes the
audit_pid to it. The audit_pid, in turn, is received from the
user space and the tool (I've checked the audit v1.6.9) uses
getpid() to pass one in the kernel. Besides, this tool doesn't
bind the netlink socket to this id, but simply creates it
allowing the kernel to auto-bind one.

That's the preamble.

The problem is that netlink_autobind() _does_not_ guarantees
that the socket will be auto-binded to the current pid. Instead
it uses the current pid as a hint to start looking for a free
id. So, in case of conflict, the audit messages can be sent
to a wrong socket. This can happen (it's unlikely, but can be)
in case some task opens more than one netlink sockets and then
the audit one starts - in this case the audit's pid can be busy
and its socket will be bound to another id.

The reason I raised this problem is that I'm now working on pid
and network namespaces and found, that this problem doesn't
allow to resolve the following issue gracefully.

The task_struct->tgid field, which is currently used in netlink
for auto-binding, is going to be deprecated. Thus I have to make
netlink auto-binding play another rules when selecting a pid,
but this will break the audit work for sure, since it implicitly
relies, that the netlink socket will be bound to the current
task pid.

What do you think about it?

Thanks,
Pavel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-14 17:25    [W:0.034 / U:2.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site