Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:24:14 -0500 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: boot cgroup questions |
| |
Paul M wrote: > Not cgroups, no. If you really wanted to extend cpusets specifically > to allow irqs to be assigned to a cpuset to control which cpus they > could execute on, then that might be a possibility. But I don't see > how this would be useful for any other cgroup subsystem, so it doesn't > belong in the generic framework.
Ok - a sensible decision.
> My feeling is that just using a simple bitmask assignment, unrelated > to cpusets or cgroups, as Max suggested in his later email is the way > to go.
I'll have to have another go at reading his replies. I seem to have more difficulty making sense of his posts ... not sure why.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
| |