lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.25-rc4
Date
On Monday, 10 of March 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> >
> > aeriksson@fastmail.fm said:
> > > torvalds@linux-foundation.org said:
> > >> I think we do want the bisect run here.
> > >> My worry is that this is likely very timing-sensitive, so when it starts
> > >> failing it might not be because of the commit that actually introduces the
> > >> bug, but because some other timing changed, but with some luck that won't
> > >> be the case.
> >
> > > I'm on it. Slow machine. Household's router, 4000 versions to go...
> >
> > The bisect came up with this:
> >
> > 18a056feccabdfa9764016a615121b194828bc72 is first bad commit
> > commit 18a056feccabdfa9764016a615121b194828bc72
>
> Hmm, this is the first commit _after_ the previous "guilty"
> commit 852738f39258deafb3d89c187cb1a4050820d555 so it just
> can't be the "real bad" one...

Well, would that be practical to prepare a patch reverting this commit
and whatever depends on it so that Anders can verify it?

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-10 14:15    [W:0.085 / U:5.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site