[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
> So now you can ask some hard questions: what if the power goes out 
> completely or the host crashes or something else goes wrong while
> critical data is still in the ramdisk? Easy: use reliable components.

Nice fiction - stuff crashes eventually - not that this isn't useful. For
a long time simply loading a 2-3GB Ramdisk off hard disk has been a good
way to build things like compile engines where loss of state is not bad.

> If UPS power runs out while ramback still holds unflushed dirty data
> then things get ugly. Hopefully a fsck -f will be able to pull
> something useful out of the mess. (This is where you might want to be
> running Ext3.) The name of the game is to install sufficient UPS power
> to get your dirty ramdisk data onto stable storage this time, every
> time.

Ext3 is only going to help you if the ramdisk writeback respects barriers
and ordering rules ?

> * Previously saved data must be reloaded into the ramdisk on startup.

/bin/cp from initrd

> * Cannot transfer directly between ramdisk and backing store, so must
> first transfer into memory then relaunch to destination.

Why not - providing you clear the dirty bit before the write and you
check it again after ? And on the disk size as you are going to have to
suck all the content back in presumably a log structure is not a big
concern ?

> * Per chunk locking is not feasible for a terabyte scale ramdisk.

And we care 8) ?

> * Handle chunk size other than PAGE_SIZE.

If you are prepared to go bigger than the fs chunk size so lose the
ordering guarantees your chunk size really ought to be *big* IMHO


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-10 10:39    [W:0.157 / U:20.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site