[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ADT746X: logical-bitwise & confusion in set_max_duty_at_crit()
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:

> > The & 0xff here is bogus anyway; temp is only ever used as an u8,
> > so just declare it as that, or do proper overflow/underflow checking
> > on it. The patch will need testing on hardware too, since it changes
> > behaviour (it should be a bugfix, but who knows).
> Maybe someone can test this?

I did. No regressions observed and it fixes that bug as well. Sorry I
didn't catch it earlier... :/

Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <>


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-10 19:15    [W:0.035 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site