[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] extend sysrq-p functionality to cover all CPUs
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:24:13 -0700
Andrew Morton <> wrote:

> > however just
> > sysrq-p seems like a waste to have because it will probably not
> > print anything useful on a large CPU system...
> Yeah, sometimes it helps to keep hitting it until you get the right CPU,
> but that rather depends on interrupt distribution.
> It would be neat to suppress the trace for idle CPUs. I don't _think_
> there's a need to display the trace for idle CPUs in sysrq-P?
> > If you still want it to be a separate letter, just let me know
> > which one of the last four I should take.
> l :)

OK, I'll do that. I will also change the show_lock to spinlock_irq_save
just in case sysrq-p gets invoked from multiple cpus simultaneously.

I'll send you the updated patch in a separate email, so the changelog
and commit logs do not have this discussion.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-10 18:07    [W:0.040 / U:4.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site