Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:33:43 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemcheck v3 |
| |
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > Yes, this is true. Then our task is to make sure that this memory is > > never allocated from tracked caches. We do have some changes in this > > area, for instance we never track task structs. Keep in mind that > > only slab objects are tracked currently, so things like stacks never > > catch page faults. I am not sure if this is exactly what you had in > > mind, but I don't know other kernel code very well enough to come up > > with perhaps more relevant examples :-) > > Given that you don't seem to handle networking yet I wonder how many > cases you really tested so far.
you are wrong about no networking support: i have booted up a full distro config on real hardware with full networking, etc.
Ingo
| |