lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] kmemcheck v3

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> > Yes, this is true. Then our task is to make sure that this memory is
> > never allocated from tracked caches. We do have some changes in this
> > area, for instance we never track task structs. Keep in mind that
> > only slab objects are tracked currently, so things like stacks never
> > catch page faults. I am not sure if this is exactly what you had in
> > mind, but I don't know other kernel code very well enough to come up
> > with perhaps more relevant examples :-)
>
> Given that you don't seem to handle networking yet I wonder how many
> cases you really tested so far.

you are wrong about no networking support: i have booted up a full
distro config on real hardware with full networking, etc.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-09 10:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans