lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] kmemcheck v3

    * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

    > > Yes, this is true. Then our task is to make sure that this memory is
    > > never allocated from tracked caches. We do have some changes in this
    > > area, for instance we never track task structs. Keep in mind that
    > > only slab objects are tracked currently, so things like stacks never
    > > catch page faults. I am not sure if this is exactly what you had in
    > > mind, but I don't know other kernel code very well enough to come up
    > > with perhaps more relevant examples :-)
    >
    > Given that you don't seem to handle networking yet I wonder how many
    > cases you really tested so far.

    you are wrong about no networking support: i have booted up a full
    distro config on real hardware with full networking, etc.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-09 10:37    [W:0.022 / U:1.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site