lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [git pull] more SLUB updates for 2.6.25
From
Date
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:
>
> What about IRQ masking then ?
>
> Many CPU pay high cost for cli/sti pair...

Many? In the x86 world only P4. On the other cores cli/sti (and even
pushf ; cli ; popf) is reasonably fast.

>
> And SLAB/SLUB allocators, even if only used from process context, want
> to disable/re-enable interrupts...
>
> I understand kmalloc() want generic pools, but dedicated pools could
> avoid this cli/sti

While there are a lot of P4s around they are obsolete by now and I would
advise against major redesigns for tuning obsolete CPUs.

-Andi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-08 16:01    [W:0.051 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site