lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit
On Wed 06-02-08 17:35:39, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
>
> > Add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 56bd421..475125e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -1280,7 +1280,10 @@ struct super_operations {
> > * Two bits are used for locking and completion notification, I_LOCK and I_SYNC.
> > *
> > * I_DIRTY_SYNC Inode itself is dirty.
> > - * I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Data-related inode changes pending
> > + * I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Data-related inode changes pending. We keep track of
> > + * ` these changes separately from I_DIRTY_SYNC so that we
> ^
>
> Looks like a typo.
Oh, OK. Thanks for spotting this. Just next to tab ;). I'll resend a
patch without the typo.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-06 17:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans