lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS
    i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
    now compile ...

    On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote:
    > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    > wrote:
    >
    > > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were
    > using
    > > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via
    > > changes to the core block layer.
    > >
    > > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. If so,
    > > perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
    >
    > Actually I think it may be an argument for keeping ub, if ub exposes
    > a bug in the __blk_end_request. I'll look at the head of the thread
    > and see if Mr. Pinter has hit anything related to Mr. Ueda's work.
    >
    > -- Pete
    >


    --
    Thanks,
    Oliver


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-05 23:33    [W:0.020 / U:0.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site