Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:37:14 +0100 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups |
| |
On Sun 03-02-08 19:33:45, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com wrote: > Hi > > This patchset contains next round of various UDF fs cleanups. > > [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks > > [PATCH 2/6] udf: create function for conversion from timestamp to timespec > [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec > [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps > [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type > These 4 patches can be folded into one if requested, but I think it's > easier to analyze them when they are split. > > [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization > Pretty mechanical work. Can be dropped and redone if it will > conflict with someone else patch. > > fs/udf/ecma_167.h | 13 - > fs/udf/inode.c | 183 ++++++----------- > fs/udf/super.c | 553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- > fs/udf/udfdecl.h | 8 > fs/udf/udfend.h | 22 -- > fs/udf/udftime.c | 39 +-- > 6 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-) > > Applies on top of patches I've sent lately (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/482) > > Jan: Are you going to create git tree for udf? I was already thinking about it to take some burden from Andrew. So if you think you are going to have more time for these cleanups then I can setup one (it would be useless when I send to Andrew one fix per month ;)...
Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR
| |