lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups
On Sun 03-02-08 19:33:45, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patchset contains next round of various UDF fs cleanups.
>
> [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks
>
> [PATCH 2/6] udf: create function for conversion from timestamp to timespec
> [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec
> [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps
> [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type
> These 4 patches can be folded into one if requested, but I think it's
> easier to analyze them when they are split.
>
> [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization
> Pretty mechanical work. Can be dropped and redone if it will
> conflict with someone else patch.
>
> fs/udf/ecma_167.h | 13 -
> fs/udf/inode.c | 183 ++++++-----------
> fs/udf/super.c | 553 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> fs/udf/udfdecl.h | 8
> fs/udf/udfend.h | 22 --
> fs/udf/udftime.c | 39 +--
> 6 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-)
>
> Applies on top of patches I've sent lately (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/482)
>
> Jan: Are you going to create git tree for udf?
I was already thinking about it to take some burden from Andrew. So if
you think you are going to have more time for these cleanups then I can
setup one (it would be useless when I send to Andrew one fix per month ;)...

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-04 20:39    [W:7.755 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site