Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:29:22 -0800 (PST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges |
| |
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion if it should become a semaphore > unconditionally or only with a CONFIG_XPMEM=y. But keep in mind > preempt-rt runs quite a bit slower, or we could rip spinlocks out of > the kernel in the first place ;)
D you just skip comments of people on the mmu_notifier? It took me to remind you about Andrew's comments to note those. And I just responded on the XPmem issue in the morning.
Again for the gazillionth time: There will be no CONFIG_XPMEM because the functionality needs to be generic and not XPMEM specific.
| |