lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/11] NFS: Introduce lifecycle management for label attribute.
From
Date

On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:04 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, David P. Quigley wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +static inline void nfs_fattr_alloc(struct nfs_fattr *fattr, gfp_t flags)
> > +{
> > + fattr->label = kzalloc(NFS4_MAXLABELLEN, flags);
> > + if (fattr->label == NULL)
> > + panic("Can't allocate security label.");
> > + fattr->label_len = NFS4_MAXLABELLEN;
> > +}
>
> A panic here seems like overkill, and also possibly a DoS vector. I
> suggest having the calling code handle the allocation failure gracefully.
>

Good point, I'll put this on the list. I think I remember you mentioned
something about this before but it must have slipped through the cracks.

> > +
> > +#define nfs_fattr_fini(fattr) _nfs_fattr_fini(fattr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__)
> > +static inline void _nfs_fattr_fini(struct nfs_fattr *fattr,
> > + const char *file, int line, const char *func)
> > +{
> > + if ((fattr)->label == NULL) {
> > + if (fattr->label_len != 0) {
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING
> > + "%s:%d %s() nfs_fattr label available (%d)\n",
> > + file, line, func,
> > + fattr->label_len);
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + if (fattr->label_len == NFS4_MAXLABELLEN)
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING
> > + "%s:%d %s() nfs_fattr label unused\n",
> > + file, line, func);
> > + else if (fattr->label_len != (strlen(fattr->label) + 1))
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING
> > + "%s:%d %s() nfs_fattr label size mismatch (label_len %d, strlen %d)\n",
> > + file, line, func,
> > + fattr->label_len, strlen(fattr->label) + 1);
> > +
> > + kfree(fattr->label);
> > + fattr->label = NULL;
> > + fattr->label_len = 0;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +#define nfs_fattr_alloc(fattr, flags)
> > +#define nfs_fattr_fini(fattr)
> > +#endif
>
> Perhaps introduce a debug configuration option for this code.

In what way? We can change them to respond to the NFS/NFSD debug
variables that are set through proc, or did you have something else in
mind?

>
>
> - James



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-28 02:15    [W:0.057 / U:24.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site