Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:28:45 +0300 | From | Pavel Emelyanov <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.25-rc3 regression] sysctl table check failed: /kernel/vsyscall64 |
| |
Frans Pop wrote: > Just tried 2.6.25-rc3 and got the error below. Boot continued normally. > Error was not present in rc2. > > System is x86_64, dual core Pentium D, Debian unstable. > > Cheers, > FJP > > P.S. Yes, I do have VirtualBox working under 2.6.25 now ;-)
That's due to commit ce28b9 x86: fix vsyscall wreckage
The proc_handler initialization is simply dropped for this table, but AFAIS from the commit comment this was done simply to disable the vsyscall_gtod_data.sysctl_enabled tuning. Did I miss something?
> [...] > checking if image is initramfs...<7>Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 1 > Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0 > it is > Freeing initrd memory: 3765k freed > sysctl table check failed: /kernel/vsyscall64 No proc_handler > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc3 #60 > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8024a61f>] set_fail+0x48/0x53 > [<ffffffff8024ab15>] sysctl_check_table+0x4eb/0x53e > [<ffffffff8024ab2f>] sysctl_check_table+0x505/0x53e > [<ffffffff8023a96e>] __register_sysctl_paths+0xf1/0x146 > [<ffffffff8023a9ec>] register_sysctl_paths+0x29/0x2b > [<ffffffff8023aa01>] register_sysctl_table+0x13/0x15 > [<ffffffff8059bb18>] vsyscall_init+0x49/0x6e > [<ffffffff8059571e>] kernel_init+0x162/0x2d2 > [<ffffffff8020ce18>] child_rip+0xa/0x12 > [<ffffffff803357dc>] ? acpi_ds_init_one_object+0x0/0x88 > [<ffffffff805955bc>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x2d2 > [<ffffffff8020ce0e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12 > > audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) > [...] > >
| |