Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:06:04 +0100 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [x86] rdc321x: Kconfig options fixes for rdc321x |
| |
* Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@telecomint.eu> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > > Le mercredi 27 février 2008, Ingo Molnar a écrit : > > these many special conditions in the Kconfig space are way too ugly. > > (Also, i can see no reason why for example hibernation wouldnt be > > possible on rdc321x, it's a pure software concept ...) > > I would have thought an embedded device with only flash memory as rom > storage could not hibertnate. > > Maybe we should turn all those special conditions into HAVE_FOO/BAR > instead ?
no. Just leave those things alone. Obviously, if you dont initiate hibernation it wont be done - and you dont have to build it in either. But there's no fundamental reason that it _couldnt_ work - if a suitable device was attached. Dont put such hardcoded dependencies into the kernel ...
Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |