lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: broken suspend in .2.6.25-rc3 on T61p (was Re: new regression in 2.6.25-rc3: no keyboard/lid acpi events on thinkpad T61p)
    On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
    > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > >
    > > > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
    > > > > toward at the power management summit several years ago
    > > > > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
    > > >
    > > > I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie
    > > > s2ram to hal, because it makes testing on minimal system hard.
    > > >
    > > > Anyway, what is the "default" way to trigger s2ram for Andrew? Perhaps
    > > > Fedora already has his machine whitelisted...
    > >
    > > There is no s2ram. pm-suspend uses the white/black-lists in pm-utils.
    > > Remember that? The cross-distro package everyone agreed was a good idea
    > > so that every distro didn't have their own magic utility ?
    >
    > Well, we have cross-distro package, it is at suspend.sf.net , and it
    > can bring up video - which is kind of important. (It is single binary,
    > so it can be pagelocked -- which is important for s2disk).
    >
    > Plus it does not depend on HAL.

    Neither does pm-utils. Once again for the hard of thinking..

    The mechanism belongs in pm-utils. HAL is just a fancy wrapper around that.
    Don't want/like hal? fine, a smaller wrapper around pm-suspend and friends
    is trivial (or even unnecessary if you're happy with running pm-suspend by hand)

    Dave

    --
    http://www.codemonkey.org.uk


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-26 19:25    [W:0.020 / U:92.736 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site