Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:22:41 -0500 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: broken suspend in .2.6.25-rc3 on T61p (was Re: new regression in 2.6.25-rc3: no keyboard/lid acpi events on thinkpad T61p) |
| |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work > > > > toward at the power management summit several years ago > > > > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes. > > > > > > I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie > > > s2ram to hal, because it makes testing on minimal system hard. > > > > > > Anyway, what is the "default" way to trigger s2ram for Andrew? Perhaps > > > Fedora already has his machine whitelisted... > > > > There is no s2ram. pm-suspend uses the white/black-lists in pm-utils. > > Remember that? The cross-distro package everyone agreed was a good idea > > so that every distro didn't have their own magic utility ? > > Well, we have cross-distro package, it is at suspend.sf.net , and it > can bring up video - which is kind of important. (It is single binary, > so it can be pagelocked -- which is important for s2disk). > > Plus it does not depend on HAL.
Neither does pm-utils. Once again for the hard of thinking..
The mechanism belongs in pm-utils. HAL is just a fancy wrapper around that. Don't want/like hal? fine, a smaller wrapper around pm-suspend and friends is trivial (or even unnecessary if you're happy with running pm-suspend by hand)
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| |