Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:49:16 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller in Kconfig |
| |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for > > filesystems it's quotas. So in this case, I *still* think you should > > be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead. It just makes it > > clearer to a larger audience what you mean. > > > > Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, but in > a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares. > This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller" in my office ;)
How about Memory Resouce Contoller ?
-Kame
| |