lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: use explicit timing delay for pit accesses in kernel and pcspkr driver
On 20-02-08 18:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Rene Herman wrote:
>>
>> _Something_ like this would seem to be the only remaining option. It
>> seems fairly unuseful to #ifdef around that switch statement for
>> kernels without support for the earlier families, but if you insist...
>>
>
> "Only remaining option" other than the one we've had all along. Even on
> the one idiotic set of systems which break, it only breaks post-ACPI
> intialization, IIRC.

Linus vetoed the DMI switch.

Rene.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-20 18:11    [W:0.063 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site