[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-next: first tree
    Hi Andy,

    On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <> wrote:
    > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases
    > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next
    > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how
    > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the
    > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor
    > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml.

    I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date
    i.e. todays was next-20080220.

    > Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I
    > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like
    > against the nearest official tag "below".

    I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought.

    Thanks for your thoughts.
    Stephen Rothwell
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-20 15:27    [W:0.020 / U:9.660 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site