Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:07:45 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt |
| |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:13:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > MAINTAINERS is the most frequently patched file > > Almost all of them merge perfectly, with no problems what-so-ever. And the > merge conflicts, when they happen, are generally really trivial, and never > cause any subtle run-time bugs even if they were to happen. > > So in that sense, I think both MAINTAINERS and the deprecation schedule > are totally uninteresting. Yes, they have merge conflicts. But those merge > conflicts are really really easy to handle.
Yes, they are easy to handle, but for trees that have to deal with these merge issues all the time, they are a pain (hit this one again today.) It takes a few minutes to fix up the resolution by hand (using either git or quilt), as we do want the new addition to be in the file, so by splitting it up, it makes our (the sub-tree maintainers) lives easier.
I've never had a problem with the MAINTAINERS file, as it is pretty big and conflicts for me seem to never happen, but the feature-removal file does cause problems as it changes over time and things need to get added and removed.
Also, there are already remants of a bad-merge in that file, which somehow sneaked through.
Yes, these files can not cause kernel bugs, but they are semi-important to at least get correct. So I'd ask you to reconsider for the feature-removal stuff at the very least.
If you do, the git tree is still there at: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-2.6.git/
to pull from :)
thanks,
greg k-h
| |