[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, "Zhang, Yanmin" said:

> I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2 unsigned long
> pading before lastuse, so the 3 members are moved to next cache line. The performance is
> recovered.
> How about below patch? Almost all performance is recovered with the new patch.
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <>

Could you add a comment someplace that says "refcnt wants to be on a different
cache line from input/output/ops or performance tanks badly", to warn some
future kernel hacker who starts adding new fields to the structure?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-18 18:37    [W:0.057 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site