[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Fix Unlikely(x) == y
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
Willy Tarreau <> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
> > Roel Kluin <> wrote:
> >
> > > The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is,
> > > please comment. ---
> > > Fix Unlikely(x) == y
> > >
> >
> > you found a great set of bugs..
> > but to be honest... I suspect it's just best to remove unlikely
> > altogether for these cases; unlikely() is almost a
> > go-faster-stripes thing, and if you don't know how to use it you
> > shouldn't be using it... so just removing it for all wrong cases is
> > actually the best thing to do imo.
> Well, eventhough the author may not know how to use it, "unlikely" at
> least indicates the intention of the author, or his knowledge of what
> should happen here. I'd suggest leaving it where it is because the
> authot of this code is in best position to know that this branch is
> unlikely to happen, eventhough he does not correctly use the macro.

you have more faith in the authors knowledge of how his code actually behaves than I think is warranted :)
Or faith in that he knows what "unlikely" means.
I should write docs about this; but unlikely() means:
1) It happens less than 0.01% of the cases.
2) The compiler couldn't have figured this out by itself
(NULL pointer checks are compiler done already, same for some other conditions)
3) It's a hot codepath where shaving 0.5 cycles (less even on x86) matters
(and the author is ok with taking a 500 cycles hit if he's wrong)

If you think unlikely() means something else, we should fix what it maps to towards gcc ;)
(to.. be empty ;)

If you want to reach me at my work email, use
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-16 18:45    [W:0.107 / U:10.292 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site