Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:28:22 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this? |
| |
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:31:40PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe > > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the > > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device > > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort. > > > > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for > > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :) > > Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment > somewhere?
That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |