Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:57:53 +0100 | From | "Oliver Pinter" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Make sysctl a separate filesystem |
| |
On 2/15/08, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote: > > On Feb 15 2008 12:35, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > >Andi Kleen writes: > > > Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> writes: > > > > this subdir; > > > > 3. sysctl inodes are now smaller than the procfs ones. > > > > > > That's always a good thing. > > > > > > > Note: update your initscripts to mount sysctl filesystem > > > > right after the proc is mounted in order not to lose your > > > > /etc/sysctl.conf configuration (and optionally fstab). > > > > > > That will break about everybody's init scripts I suspect. > > > > > > I think you would need to go through some deprecation > > > period for this at least, with printks warning people > > > to fix their init scripts. > > > > > > Or better find some way to do the mount automatically. > > > >Doing it automatically is the only acceptable way, IMO. > > For time being only. > > The kernel (currently) only auto-mounts invisible filesystems. and /selinux with selinuxfs, it is automounted ... but it is visible fs
> -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Thanks, Oliver
| |