Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:20:08 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this? |
| |
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
thanks,
greg k-h
| |