Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:27:00 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3 |
| |
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:49:31 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > printk is a special case, I think. It's the primary logging/debugging > > method which can't fail and as it's mostly interpreted by human beings > > (and developers in problematic cases), it has different maneuvering room > > on errors - ie. it's far better to print messages w/o header or proper > > log level than failing to print, which is quite different requirements > > from other components. > > Andrew, any more comments or suggestions on how to proceed on this?
Nope.
> One > way or the other, I think this is a problem worth solving.
There are a lot of such problems ;)
| |