Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:01:55 +0100 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] kgdb-light -v10 |
| |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > > Anyways the slight risk of the other CPUs eventually recovering would > > seem a acceptable trade off versus not being able to use the debugger > > to debug the system with hanging CPUs. > > see? There's the difference between us. The initial merge of KGDB does > not want to include policies for nuances that pose an "acceptable slight > risk".
Ok fine. Please implement DMA quiescence on kgdb entry then; otherwise the code won't conform to your standards at all.
-Andi
| |