[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BTRFS partition usage...

    On Feb 12 2008 09:08, Chris Mason wrote:
    >> >
    >> >So, if Btrfs starts zeroing at 1k, will that be acceptable for you?
    >> Something looks wrong here. Why would btrfs need to zero at all?
    >> Superblock at 0, and done. Just like xfs.
    >> (Yes, I had xfs on sparc before, so it's not like you NEED the
    >> whitespace at the start of a partition.)
    >I've had requests to move the super down to 64k to make room for bootloaders,
    >which may not matter for sparc, but I don't really plan on different
    >locations for different arches.

    In x86, there is even more space for a bootloader (some 28k or so)
    even if your partition table is as closely packed as possible,
    from 0 to 7e00 IIRC.

    For sparc you could have something like

    startlba endlba type
    sda1 0 2 1 Boot
    sda2 2 58 3 Whole disk
    sda3 58 90000 83 Linux

    and slap the bootloader into "MBR", just like on x86.
    Or I am missing something..

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-12 15:25    [W:0.020 / U:8.940 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site