Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:10:22 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected) |
| |
* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/02/2008, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > > > --- > > - restore the old wakeup mechanism > > and how does it change behavior, logically-wise? > > do we somehow miss a 'wake-up' from kthread_stop() so that its caller > gets blocked until watchdog's msleep_interruptible(10000) timeouts? On > average, it would take +-5 sec. and might explain the first > observation of Ravael -- "...adds a 5 - 10 sec delay..." (although, > lately he reported up to +30 sec. delays). > > (/me goint to also try reproducing it later today)
thanks - i cannot reproduce it on my usual suspend/resume testbox because e1000 broke on it, and this is a pretty annoying regression. We'll have to undo the hung-tasks detection feature if it's not fixed quickly. (there's no point in debugging features that _add_ bugs)
Ingo
| |