Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:32:28 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] RT scheduler updates for tip |
| |
* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, > FWIW, I have placed all my latest upstream-able scheduler patches into > a branch in my git tree (against tip/master). > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ghaskins/linux-2.6-hacks.git > sched/latest > > Gregory Haskins (11): > sched: cleanup inc/dec_rt_tasks > sched: track the next-highest priority on each runqueue > sched: use highest_prio.curr for pull threshold > sched: use highest_prio.next to optimize pull operations > sched: only try to push a task on wakeup if it is migratable > sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit > critical section > sched: make double-lock-balance fair > sched: add sched_class->needs_post_schedule() member > plist: fix PLIST_NODE_INIT to work with debug enabled > sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt > RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly > > include/linux/init_task.h | 1 + > include/linux/plist.h | 9 +- > include/linux/sched.h | 2 + > kernel/sched.c | 89 +++++++++++-- > kernel/sched_rt.c | 324 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 5 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > > These are built/booted on my quad-core/x86_64 and look good to me. > > 1) the first four are the "next-highest" v3 patches that I submitted > yesterday 2) the last seven are patches that Steven has carried in > 26-rt that have not yet been pulled in to tip > > I assume there is an implicit ACK from Steven on (2) since he pulled > them into -rt. We still await comment from Peter re: (1).
pulled into tip/cpus4096, thanks Gregory!
(It goes into the cpumask tree because it already changed a few areas that you relied on.)
Ingo
| |