[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime
    On Friday 05 December 2008 23:25:22 Rusty Russell wrote:
    > On Friday 05 December 2008 22:28:16 David Howells wrote:
    > > With that, the core_param stuff does work for mem=...
    > > It should, perhaps,
    > > appear in /proc/cmdline, but for some reason it does not.
    > Hmm, that's more concering. I'll dig into this in the morning.

    OK, I can't reproduce it. I was thinking some weird corner case
    with not restoring the string in parse_args, but putting in a dummy
    "mem" core_param() on x86 works as first, middle and last arg on cmdline,
    and command line shows up correctly in /proc/cmdline.

    Any chance I can ask you to verify that? Is the commandline printk'd
    on boot also wrong?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-07 10:25    [W:0.019 / U:33.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site