[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy

>> I wonder if we need FASYNC at all. This could be gotten implicitely by
>> looking at the fasync_list
> Only if socket.

But the helpers used by the character drivers add it too I think.

> Serioulsy, I think the best (partial, yes) fix for now is to restore
> lock_kernel() in setfl() and change ioctl_fioxxx() accordingly.
> At least this protect us from tty too.

For 2.6.28 I agree.

> Not that I think this is very good idea though ;)

The lock bit sounds reasonable.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-03 22:23    [W:0.084 / U:0.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site