[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy

    >> I wonder if we need FASYNC at all. This could be gotten implicitely by
    >> looking at the fasync_list
    > Only if socket.

    But the helpers used by the character drivers add it too I think.

    > Serioulsy, I think the best (partial, yes) fix for now is to restore
    > lock_kernel() in setfl() and change ioctl_fioxxx() accordingly.
    > At least this protect us from tty too.

    For 2.6.28 I agree.

    > Not that I think this is very good idea though ;)

    The lock bit sounds reasonable.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-03 22:23    [W:0.030 / U:12.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site