[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: writing file to disk: not as easy as it looks

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:

> > Ok, "memory failed before disk" is ... bad hardware.
> It's PC class hardware. Live with it. Back when SGI made their own
> hardware, they noticed this problem, and so they wired up their SGI
> machines with powerfail interrupts, and extra big capacitors in their
> power supplies, and when Irix got a powerfail interrupt, it would
> frantically run around aborting DMA transfers to avoid this particular
> problem. At least, that's what an old-timer SGI engineer (who is
> unfortunately no longer at SGI) told me.

I heard this too --- I just don't understand why did they route it to an
interrupt and undertook the complicated sequence of aborting the commands
by the kernel --- instead of simply routing it to PCI reset line --- that
would reset the controller and stop it from feeding data to disks.

Also, if they had ECC memory, the chipset should detect unrecoverable
garbage and respond with target-abort or full system reset and not feed
bad data to the controller.

> PC class hardware don't have power fail interrupts. Hence, my advice
> to you is that if you use a filesystem that does logical journalling
> --- better have a UPS.

ATX has PWR_OK pin that should be deasserted on power failure before the
voltage drops.

I don't know if motherboards use it --- but there should be no problem
routing the pin to the chipset reset and stop it before power goes low.

> > ...but... you seem to be saying that modern filesystems can damage
> > data even on "sane" hardware.
> The example I gave was one where a disk failure could cause a file
> that had previously been sucessfully written to disk and fsync()'ed to
> be damaged by another filesystem operation ***in the face of hard
> drive failure***. Surely that is obvious. The most obvious case of
> that might be if the disk controller gets confused and slams a data
> block into the wrong location on disk (there's a reason why DIF
> includes the sector number in its checksum and why some enterprise
> databases do the same thing in their tablespace blocks --- it happens
> often enough that paranoid data integrity engineers worry about it).

You can read the block number back from ATA disk after you write it and
before you submit the command.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-03 16:37    [W:0.151 / U:3.992 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site