Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:03:28 +0100 | | From | Adam Lackorzynski <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.28, vmalloc.c, vmap_page_range |
| |
On Fri Dec 26, 2008 at 16:39:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:02:35 +0100 Adam Lackorzynski <adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > in 2.6.28, the flush_cache_vmap in vmap_page_range() is called with the end of > > the range twice. The following patch fixes this for me. > > > > Did this bug have any observeable runtime effects? If so, what were > they?
Just in my own code, i.e. it doesn't have any effects to the kernel itself.
> Well yeah. This is what happens when functions modify their incoming > arguments. It's a bad programming practice which leads directly to > exactly this sort of bug. > > How about we fix that?
fine.
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c~vmallocc-fix-flushing-in-vmap_page_range > +++ a/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -151,11 +151,12 @@ static int vmap_pud_range(pgd_t *pgd, un > * > * Ie. pte at addr+N*PAGE_SIZE shall point to pfn corresponding to pages[N] > */ > -static int vmap_page_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > +static int vmap_page_range(unsigned long start_addr, unsigned long end, > pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages) > { > pgd_t *pgd; > unsigned long next; > + unsigned long addr = start_addr; > int err = 0; > int nr = 0; > > @@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ static int vmap_page_range(unsigned long > if (err) > break; > } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end); > - flush_cache_vmap(addr, end); > + flush_cache_vmap(start_addr, end); > > if (unlikely(err)) > return err;
Adam -- Adam adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
|  |