lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BUG] cdev_put() race condition
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 00:30:39 Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:23:41AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 22:21:50 Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 21:22:48 Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:56:26PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laurent found a race condition in the uvc driver that we traced
>>>>>>> to the way chrdev_open and cdev_put/get work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You need the following ingredients to reproduce it:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) a hot-pluggable char device like an USB webcam.
>>>>>>> 2) a manually created device node for such a webcam instead of
>>>>>>> relying on udev.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In order to easily force this situation you would also need to
>>>>>>> add a delay to the char device's release() function. For
>>>>>>> webcams that would be at the top of v4l2_chardev_release() in
>>>>>>> drivers/media/video/v4l2-dev.c. But adding a delay to e.g.
>>>>>>> cdev_purge would have the same effect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The sequence of events in the case of a webcam is as follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) The USB device is removed, causing a disconnect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) The webcam driver unregisters the video device which in turn
>>>>>>> calls cdev_del().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) When the last application using the device is closed, the
>>>>>>> cdev is released when the kref of the cdev's kobject goes to 0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4) If the kref's release() call takes a while due to e.g. extra
>>>>>>> cleanup in the case of a webcam, then another application can
>>>>>>> try to open the video device. Note that this requires a device
>>>>>>> node created with mknod, otherwise the device nodes would
>>>>>>> already have been removed by udev.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5) chrdev_open checks inode->i_cdev. If this is NULL (i.e. this
>>>>>>> device node was never accessed before), then all is fine since
>>>>>>> kobj_lookup will fail because cdev_del() has been called
>>>>>>> earlier. However, if this device node was used earlier, then
>>>>>>> the else part is called: cdev_get(p). This 'p' is the cdev that
>>>>>>> is being released. Since the kref count is 0 you will get a
>>>>>>> WARN message from kref_get, but the code continues on, the
>>>>>>> f_op->open will (hopefully) return more-or-less gracefully with
>>>>>>> an error and the cdev_put at the end will cause the refcount to
>>>>>>> go to 0 again, which results in a SECOND call to the kref's
>>>>>>> release function!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See this link for the original discussion on the v4l list
>>>>>>> containing stack traces an a patch that you need if you want to
>>>>>>> (and can) test this with the uvc driver:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/vfl/msg39967.html
>>>>>> The second sentence in that message shows your problem here:
>>>>>> To avoid the need of a reference count in every v4l2 driver,
>>>>>> v4l2 moved to cdev which includes its own reference counting
>>>>>> infrastructure based on kobject.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cdev is not ment to handle the reference counting of any object
>>>>>> outside of itself, and should never be embedded within anything.
>>>>>> I've been thinking of taking the real "kobject" out of that
>>>>>> structure for a long time now, incase someone did something
>>>>>> foolish like this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems I was too late :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, to solve this, just remove the reliance on struct cdev in
>>>>>> your own structures, you don't want to do this for the very
>>>>>> reason you have now found (and for others, like the fact that
>>>>>> this isn't a "real" struct kobject in play here, just a fake
>>>>>> one.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ick, what a mess.
>>>>> Sorry, but this makes no sense. First of all the race condition
>>>>> exists regardless of how v4l uses it. Other drivers using cdev with
>>>>> a hot-pluggable device in combination with a manually created
>>>>> device node should show the same problem.
>>>> I don't see how this would be, unless this problem has always existed
>>>> in the cdev code, it was created back before dynamic device nodes
>>>> with udev existed :)
>>>>
>>>>> It's just that we found it with v4l because the release callback
>>>>> takes longer than usual, thus increasing the chances of hitting the
>>>>> race.
>>>> The release callback for the cdev itself?
>>> Yes, although we override the release kobj_type.
>> Hahaha, yeah, I'm really afraid to say it, but you deserve the oops if
>> you do that :)
>>
>>> I noticed that a patch to do this through a cdev function was recently
>>> posted (and possibly already merged).
>> No, it was rejected as it was not needed.
>>
>>>>> The core problem is simply that it is possible to call cdev_get
>>>>> while in cdev_put! That should never happen.
>>>> True, and cdev_put is only called from __fput() which has the proper
>>>> locking to handle the call to cdev_get() if a char device is opened,
>>>> right?
>>> cdev_put is also called through cdev_del, and that's where the problem
>>> resides. The cdev_del() call has no locking to prevent a call from
>>> cdev_get(), and it can be called asynchronously as well in response to
>>> a USB disconnect.
>>>
>>>>> Secondly, why shouldn't struct cdev be embedded in anything? It's
>>>>> used in lots of drivers that way. I really don't see what's unusual
>>>>> or messy about v4l in that respect.
>>>> I don't see it embedded in any other structures at the moment, and
>>>> used to reference count the structure, do you have pointers to where
>>>> it is?
>>> Hmm, I took a closer look and it looks like v4l is indeed the first to
>>> use cdev for refcounting. Others either don't need it or do their own
>>> refcounting. It's definitely embedded in several structs, though. (grep
>>> for cdev_init)
>> Yes, embedding it is fine, just don't use it for reference counting as
>> it is using it's own reference counting for something other than what
>> you want to use it for.
>>
>> Overriding the release function should have given you the hint that this
>> is not the structure that you should be using for this kind of
>> operation.
>>
>>> However, I don't see how any amount of refcounting in drivers can
>>> prevent this race. At some point cdev_del() is called and (if nobody is
>>> using the chardev) cdev's kref goes to 0 triggering the release, and at
>>> that moment chrdev_open() can be called and the driver has no chance to
>>> prevent that, only cdev can do that.
>> Again, don't use cdev's reference counting for your own object
>> lifecycle, it is different and will cause problems, like you have found
>> out.
>
> Sigh. It has nothing to do with how v4l uses it. And to demonstrate this,
> here is how you reproduce it with the sg module (tested it with my USB
> harddisk).
>
> 1) apply this patch to char_dev.c:
>
> --- char_dev.c.orig 2008-12-17 13:30:22.000000000 +0100
> +++ char_dev.c 2008-12-17 08:50:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -412,6 +412,9 @@
>
> static void cdev_purge(struct cdev *cdev)
> {
> + printk("delayin\n");
> + mdelay(2000);
> + printk("delayout\n");
> spin_lock(&cdev_lock);
> while (!list_empty(&cdev->list)) {
> struct inode *inode;
>
>
> 2) connect your harddisk and make note of the sgX device that's created.
> 3) use mknod to create an sgX device manually for that harddisk.
> 4) open and close it (cat ./sgX >/dev/null followed by ctrl-C is sufficient)
> 5) disconnect the harddisk
> 6) when 'delayin' appears in the log, run cat ./sgX >/dev/null again
> 7) sit back and enjoy this lovely race condition:
>
> usb-storage: device found at 6
> usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
> scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access WD 5000BEV External 1.05 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Write Protect is off
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Mode Sense: 21 00 00 00
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Assuming drive cache: write through
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Write Protect is off
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Mode Sense: 21 00 00 00
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Assuming drive cache: write through
> sdg: sdg1
> sd 6:0:0:0: [sdg] Attached SCSI disk
> sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg8 type 0
> usb-storage: device scan complete
> usb 2-4.1: USB disconnect, address 6
> delayin
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at lib/kref.c:43 kref_get+0x17/0x1c()
> Modules linked in: sg
> Pid: 1491, comm: cat Not tainted 2.6.26-durdane-test #3
> [<c0134ad4>] warn_on_slowpath+0x40/0x79
> [<c0160ff8>] __do_fault+0x2e4/0x334
> [<c017e0c7>] __d_lookup+0xce/0x115
> [<c0175393>] do_lookup+0x53/0x145
> [<c017d523>] dput+0x16/0xdc
> [<c0176d53>] __link_path_walk+0xb36/0xc30
> [<c0181d44>] mntput_no_expire+0x18/0xef
> [<c02225fb>] kref_get+0x17/0x1c
> [<c0221be2>] kobject_get+0xf/0x13
> [<c01710b1>] cdev_get+0x55/0x69
> [<c01712ce>] chrdev_open+0xc2/0x184
> [<c017120c>] chrdev_open+0x0/0x184
> [<c016dd3b>] __dentry_open+0x127/0x210
> [<c016dea1>] nameidata_to_filp+0x1c/0x2c
> [<c01780c4>] do_filp_open+0x33d/0x6d5
> [<c016daee>] get_unused_fd_flags+0xb8/0xc2
> [<c016db35>] do_sys_open+0x3d/0xb6
> [<c016dbf2>] sys_open+0x1e/0x23
> [<c01188a9>] sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0x91
> =======================
> ---[ end trace c8225d49e3c03b85 ]---
> delayin
> delayout
> delayout
>
> Note the duplicate 'delayin' messages. Also note that the cdev struct was
> allocated by sg.c, so the second cdev cleanup will likely poke into already
> freed memory.
>
> I tried to reproduce it as well without the patched char_dev.c by using this
> little program:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
>
> main()
> {
> int state = 0;
>
> while (1) {
> int fh = open("./sg8", O_RDONLY);
> if (fh >= 0) {
> if (state == 0) {
> printf("opened\n");
> state = 1;
> }
> close(fh);
> }
> else {
> if (state) {
> printf("error\n");
> state = 0;
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> Just run it and connect/disconnect the USB harddisk.
>
> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to reproduce it because I always hit a bug in
> khelper first after only a few attempts:
>
> sd 13:0:0:0: [sdg] Assuming drive cache: write through
> sdg: sdg1
> sd 13:0:0:0: [sdg] Attached SCSI disk
> sd 13:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg8 type 0
> usb-storage: device scan complete
> usb 2-4.1: USB disconnect, address 13
> VFS: Close: file count is 0
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
> IP: [<c0409df2>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x13/0x25
> *pdpt = 000000002ebb5001 *pde = 0000000000000000
> Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in: nvidia(P)
>
> Pid: 13662, comm: khelper Tainted: P (2.6.26-durdane #1)
> EIP: 0060:[<c0409df2>] EFLAGS: 00010002 CPU: 1
> EIP is at _spin_lock_irqsave+0x13/0x25
> EAX: 00000004 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000213 EDX: 00000100
> ESI: 00000004 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: eeabffc8
> DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
> Process khelper (pid: 13662, ti=eeabe000 task=eeb280c0 task.ti=eeabe000)
> Stack: c012e788 ee8fb300 00000000 00000000 c014144c 00000000 c01413ec
> c01194ab
> ee8fb300 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c012e788>] complete+0xf/0x36
> [<c014144c>] wait_for_helper+0x60/0x65
> [<c01413ec>] wait_for_helper+0x0/0x65
> [<c01194ab>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> =======================
> Code: 90 89 e2 81 e2 00 e0 ff ff ff 42 14 f0 83 28 01 79 05 e8 ae ff ff ff
> c3 9c 59 fa 89 e2 81 e2 00 e0 ff ff ff 42 14 ba 00 01 00 00 <f0> 66 0f c1
> 10 38 f2 74 06 f3 90 8a 10 eb f6 89 c8 c3 fa 89 e2
> EIP: [<c0409df2>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x13/0x25 SS:ESP 0068:eeabffc8
> ---[ end trace f5d38a13beb6dc77 ]---
> note: khelper[13662] exited with preempt_count 1
>
> I tried the same on a 2.6.28-rc8 kernel and got the same khelper error.
> Lovely.
>
> So, my conclusion remains that cdev has a race condition due to insufficient
> locking between cdev_del/put and cdev_get. And that khelper has it's own
> problems as well :-(
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>

Hi Hans

Just as a far shot could you try this patch:

[PATCH RESEND] char_dev: add cdev->release() and convert cdev_alloc() to use it
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg808783.html

Your goals look related. Also see the lkml thread.

Please cc me on the matter.

Thanks
Boaz


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-17 15:55    [W:0.973 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site