lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator
    On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Christoph Lameter
    <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
    > AFAICT this is the special case that matters in terms of the database
    > test you are trying to improve. The case there is likely the result
    > of bad cache unfriendly programming. You may actually improve the
    > benchmark more if the cachelines would be kept hot there in the right
    > way.

    Lets not forget the order-0 page thing, which is nice from page
    allocator fragmentation point of view. But I suppose SLUB can use them
    as well if we get around fixing the page allocator fastpaths?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-13 10:07    [W:4.755 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site