lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> [Steven Rostedt - Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:22:49PM -0500]
> ...
> | > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> | > ===================================================================
> | > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> | > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> | > @@ -1,6 +1,33 @@
> | > #ifndef _ASM_X86_FTRACE_H
> | > #define _ASM_X86_FTRACE_H
> | >
> | > +#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> |
> | Why add assembly condition? We only want this if CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> | is enabled, right? We could combine it with the current #ifndef inside
> | the CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER. But I would make do:
> |
> | #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> | <your stuff>
> | #else
> | < C stuff >
> | #endif
> |
> | -- Steve
>
> Steve, here is how it could look like:
> (I liked first proposal more :)

I see the confusion. In ftrace.h the function graph tracer config is not
inside CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER, even though it is dependent on it (or
was). OK, just do your first proposal then.

-- Steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-12 23:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog